Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Doug Dawson's avatar

Mike: The problem is far from solved. It's absolutely impossible for a cellular company to be delivery at least 100/20 Mbps across large geographic areas. Speeds die within two miles or so of cell sites and 90% of these claimed speeds are completely bogus. This is an attempt by the cellular companies to squelch competition by denying grant funding to huge numbers of rural customers. To me, this is a bigger scandal than when CenturyLink and Frontier tried to switch tens of thousands of Census blocks to have 25/3 Mbps broadband on the even of allocating RDOF.

Expand full comment
Adam's avatar

The drop in "Served" in North Carolina is almost entirely attributable to a drop of ~900,000 locations served by "UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION". Verizon also went down by ~80,000 houses served.

Edit: Oh gosh--you totally mentioned that in the article, my bad!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts