3 Comments

Ran some rough estimates and it looks like the V2 fabric added quite a few points in urban areas and removed a smaller amount from rural areas. In our area ~8k unserved points were removed and ~40 k served points were removed from V1 of the fabric. If coverages remained the same (this is way more fuzzy math) ~6.5 k unserved locations were added and ~55 k served locations were added in V2.

Long story short, it seems the fabric's algorithm had a far larger impact than challenges for most states. Alaska, West Virginia, and South Carolina may be exceptions to that rule as they seem to have been rather successful at locating rural fabric points but who knows if the algorithm would have found those anyway? Also, who knows if eyeballing "rural" actually translates to unserved in different areas of the county, it's super interesting how diverse the landscape/way folks distribute themselves in different areas of the country. Interesting stuff nonetheless!

Expand full comment

Super interesting. Thanks for digging in on this.

Expand full comment

Agree that a challenge process of warranted and critical, but that much of this will end up being a waste of consulting fees (and time).

Expand full comment